<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>RED TECHNOPOLITICS</title>
	<atom:link href="http://redtechnopolitics.wordpress.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://redtechnopolitics.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>Giving technoscience the Reboot</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 08:17:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<cloud domain='redtechnopolitics.wordpress.com' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />

			<item>
		<title>The world is becoming non-western</title>
		<link>http://redtechnopolitics.wordpress.com/2009/02/03/the-world-is-becoming-non-western/</link>
		<comments>http://redtechnopolitics.wordpress.com/2009/02/03/the-world-is-becoming-non-western/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 08:08:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ativak</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[4342121]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redtechnopolitics.wordpress.com/?p=61</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["The world is becoming global, nonwestern, at an incredible rate." Geert Lovink announced this at UC Irvine in Feb 2009, at the Critical Theory Emphasis (CTE) Winter Mini-Seminar. But there's Ethan Zuckerman in Africa, “he’s trying to help empower people to speak in their own languages.” These are just random quotes, but they seem no less bizarre out of context than they were in the context of this lecture. In its general form, however, it was all to ofamiliar : several slides with statistics and maps of internet usage, predicting its worlwide expansion and calling for radically new theory to address this new object. As a graduate student pointed out, it was all delivered in corporate speak, using the language of commodities and markets.<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=redtechnopolitics.wordpress.com&blog=2602553&post=61&subd=redtechnopolitics&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://redtechnopolitics.wordpress.com/2009/02/03/the-world-is-becoming-non-western/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/aeb26dbebaa7ded92b78525a38a64780?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">ativak</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Question on Property</title>
		<link>http://redtechnopolitics.wordpress.com/2008/08/17/question-on-property/</link>
		<comments>http://redtechnopolitics.wordpress.com/2008/08/17/question-on-property/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 16:58:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>M Murphy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[4342121]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redtechnopolitics.wordpress.com/?p=56</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is a question for Kavita, following our discussions of distributed ontology.
I&#8217;m wounder if property is a candidate for rethinking via distributed ontology. If property is understood a a relation, rather than a thing with a status, might we then think of the question of ontology &#8212; becoming&#8211; as located in the relations (which are [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=redtechnopolitics.wordpress.com&blog=2602553&post=56&subd=redtechnopolitics&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://redtechnopolitics.wordpress.com/2008/08/17/question-on-property/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/2afff8fc4b10d13ad046822d7aef9699?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">M Murphy</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Distributed Ontology II</title>
		<link>http://redtechnopolitics.wordpress.com/2008/08/16/distributed-ontology-ii/</link>
		<comments>http://redtechnopolitics.wordpress.com/2008/08/16/distributed-ontology-ii/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 22:57:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>M Murphy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[4342121]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redtechnopolitics.wordpress.com/?p=50</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Kavita&#8217;s comments about my previous attempt to grasp at &#8220;distributed ontology&#8221; has pushed me to try again.  I&#8217;m finding what I want to say quite elusive, so I&#8217;ll try starting with some things I don&#8217;t think I want to mean by the term:
Distributed ontology is NOT simply multiple things at once (I think this [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=redtechnopolitics.wordpress.com&blog=2602553&post=50&subd=redtechnopolitics&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://redtechnopolitics.wordpress.com/2008/08/16/distributed-ontology-ii/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/2afff8fc4b10d13ad046822d7aef9699?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">M Murphy</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>In our docks now</title>
		<link>http://redtechnopolitics.wordpress.com/2008/07/21/in-our-docks-now/</link>
		<comments>http://redtechnopolitics.wordpress.com/2008/07/21/in-our-docks-now/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 21:25:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ativak</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[4342121]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Product]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redtechnopolitics.wordpress.com/?p=44</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, now that visa problems prevent euro travel this summer, i might as well turn my mind to what&#8217;s in my dock, what&#8217;s moving across my desk, what&#8217;s in the hopper, and what need concentrated work. Summer&#8217;s a time when we must turn ourselves more than ever to productivity concerns, hmm?
It would be nice to [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=redtechnopolitics.wordpress.com&blog=2602553&post=44&subd=redtechnopolitics&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://redtechnopolitics.wordpress.com/2008/07/21/in-our-docks-now/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/aeb26dbebaa7ded92b78525a38a64780?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">ativak</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Flows in the Victorian Economy</title>
		<link>http://redtechnopolitics.wordpress.com/2008/06/08/flows-in-the-victorian-economy/</link>
		<comments>http://redtechnopolitics.wordpress.com/2008/06/08/flows-in-the-victorian-economy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jun 2008 23:50:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ativak</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[4342121]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redtechnopolitics.wordpress.com/?p=39</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the context of our June 5 08 discussion about the specific nature of the connections between reproduction, generation, and political economies of the late 20th C, I recalled Shuttleworth&#8217;s attempt to do something similar with female bodies and the 19th C. so I thought I&#8217;d post some quotes from Sally Shuttleworth&#8217;s essay Uterine economy  [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=redtechnopolitics.wordpress.com&blog=2602553&post=39&subd=redtechnopolitics&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://redtechnopolitics.wordpress.com/2008/06/08/flows-in-the-victorian-economy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/aeb26dbebaa7ded92b78525a38a64780?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">ativak</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>desire, value, consumption&#8211; Curtis&#8217;s Century of the Self</title>
		<link>http://redtechnopolitics.wordpress.com/2008/05/31/desire-value-consumption-curtiss-century-of-the-self/</link>
		<comments>http://redtechnopolitics.wordpress.com/2008/05/31/desire-value-consumption-curtiss-century-of-the-self/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2008 05:46:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>M Murphy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[4342121]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redtechnopolitics.wordpress.com/?p=37</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Adam Curtis&#8217;s four part documentary Century of the Self manages to brilliantly capture some of the involutions between notions of creativity, emotional expresson, marketing, public realtions, and new modes of flexible capital.  The third installment, like Kavita&#8217;s discussion in earlier post, makes the argument that counter-conduct in the 1960s and 70s  became constituent features [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=redtechnopolitics.wordpress.com&blog=2602553&post=37&subd=redtechnopolitics&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://redtechnopolitics.wordpress.com/2008/05/31/desire-value-consumption-curtiss-century-of-the-self/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/2afff8fc4b10d13ad046822d7aef9699?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">M Murphy</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Diamond Mines and Appropriated Feminism</title>
		<link>http://redtechnopolitics.wordpress.com/2008/05/26/diamond-mines-and-appropriated-feminism/</link>
		<comments>http://redtechnopolitics.wordpress.com/2008/05/26/diamond-mines-and-appropriated-feminism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 22:46:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>M Murphy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Reproduction/Production]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appropriation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[necropolitics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[feminism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redtechnopolitics.wordpress.com/?p=33</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#8217;s a new disturbing twist on reproduction/Production and the entanglements of feminisms in global capital. The International Women&#8217;s Health Coalition, the New York based transnational feminist NGO that was so influential in reappropriating international policy language towards feminist projects of &#8220;reproductive health and &#8220;reproductive rights&#8221; have themselves become entangled with diamond mining in South Africa, [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=redtechnopolitics.wordpress.com&blog=2602553&post=33&subd=redtechnopolitics&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://redtechnopolitics.wordpress.com/2008/05/26/diamond-mines-and-appropriated-feminism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/2afff8fc4b10d13ad046822d7aef9699?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">M Murphy</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Counterculture/Cyberculture</title>
		<link>http://redtechnopolitics.wordpress.com/2008/05/26/counterculturecyberculture/</link>
		<comments>http://redtechnopolitics.wordpress.com/2008/05/26/counterculturecyberculture/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 20:28:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ativak</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Event]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redtechnopolitics.wordpress.com/?p=32</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;From Counterculture to Cyberculture: Stewart Brand, the Whole Earth network, and the rise of digital utopianism&#8221; is a nice book by Fred Turner (U of Chicago Press, 2006). It parallels the story of &#8217;70s feminists and neoliberalism that Murphy tells. The 1960s hippie scene and its embrace of visions of wholeness, interconnection (-systems theory), social [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=redtechnopolitics.wordpress.com&blog=2602553&post=32&subd=redtechnopolitics&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://redtechnopolitics.wordpress.com/2008/05/26/counterculturecyberculture/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/aeb26dbebaa7ded92b78525a38a64780?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">ativak</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Micro-credit&#8211; signs of accumulation by dispossession</title>
		<link>http://redtechnopolitics.wordpress.com/2008/04/22/micro-credit-signs-of-accumulation-by-dispossession/</link>
		<comments>http://redtechnopolitics.wordpress.com/2008/04/22/micro-credit-signs-of-accumulation-by-dispossession/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 16:34:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>M Murphy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[4342121]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redtechnopolitics.wordpress.com/?p=30</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Grameen Bank of Bangladesh opened up an American branch in Jackson Heights, New York.  Here&#8217;s the agencies blog: Grameen America &#8211; Blog. 
This is surely a symptom of at least two things:
First, the continued, and perhaps even intensified, traffic in the articulation of neoliberal economic practices and epistemologies  between the U.S. and South Asia.    [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=redtechnopolitics.wordpress.com&blog=2602553&post=30&subd=redtechnopolitics&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://redtechnopolitics.wordpress.com/2008/04/22/micro-credit-signs-of-accumulation-by-dispossession/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/2afff8fc4b10d13ad046822d7aef9699?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">M Murphy</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Commons &amp; Pirates</title>
		<link>http://redtechnopolitics.wordpress.com/2008/03/26/commons-pirates/</link>
		<comments>http://redtechnopolitics.wordpress.com/2008/03/26/commons-pirates/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 19:18:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ativak</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[thinking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redtechnopolitics.wordpress.com/?p=29</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Peter Linebaugh (who co-authored Many-headed Hydra with Marcus Rediker) has a new book out, which reads the Magna Carta and the Forest Charter together as manifestos/ procedural mechanisms of the commons. I read one chapter (published as an essay in CNS Dec 07) which draws primarily on the work of south asian historians of forestry. [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=redtechnopolitics.wordpress.com&blog=2602553&post=29&subd=redtechnopolitics&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://redtechnopolitics.wordpress.com/2008/03/26/commons-pirates/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/aeb26dbebaa7ded92b78525a38a64780?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">ativak</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>