Planning for 4S 2009

24 01 2008

Should we make plans for 4s panels on postcolonial/feminist/global south / race etc? Ravi Rajan has some ideas, coming out of his work at UC Santa Cruz environmental studies.

Tim Mitchell reports on his website that he’s working on STS and postcolonial theory. Invite him to join us?

The Work of Economics: How a Discipline Makes Its World, …developed Mitchell’s interest in the broader field of science and technology studies (STS). His current research brings together the fields of STS and postcolonial theory in a project on “Carbon Democracy,” which examines the history of fossil fuels and the possibilities for democractic politics that were expanded or closed down in the construction of modern energy networks





The Copy

24 01 2008

 

Cori Hayden

Lucy Suchman

 

4S Rotterdam  2008

 

Panel proposal:

 

Mere innovation: Postcolonial and other ruminations on invention and

imitation

Co-organizers:

Cori Hayden (UC Berkeley) and Lucy Suchman (University of Lancaster)

 

Innovation is often defined through its distance from the old, or ‘the

same.’  As such, and by extension, it gains moral, political, and

technical force by its presumed and actively produced contrast with the

merely imitative, or the mere copy.  Even in a moment in which U.S.

corporate models of innovation seem open to growing political and

technical critique, this contrast continues to operate.  For example,

“open source” bioscience consortia, among many other Anglo-European

efforts to reengineer the infrastructures of research, development, and

distribution, actively fetishize innovation, at the expense of the mere

copy.  (Many open source-inspired platforms, in other words, are justified

by their ability to help us build a better mousetrap).  This panel seeks

to make ‘the mere’ interesting by drawing our attention to a range of

engagements with the idea of “the same, with a difference.”  Among other

things, as Ivan da Costa Marques has argued, doing so opens to further

scrutiny the morally and politically charged line between innovation and

the copy which has long organized colonial and post-colonial iterations of

modernity and difference.  It also opens up the space of ‘the copy’ (or of

imitation, similarity, and the substitute – not all the same thing) to

critical reflection, allowing us to examine the many kinds of

technical-political projects undertaken in their name.  Our goal in

‘mere-ing’ innovation is thus not simply to reverse the moral charge– that

is, it is not to restore practices denounced as imitative to their

rightful place in the annals of invention, nor conversely to denounce

declared practices of innovation as (merely) something less impressive.

Rather, we seek to think empirically and historically about how sameness,

similarity, and difference are themselves at stake in a range of sites,

practices, and projects.

 





how to logon

24 01 2008

This conversation and site is open. Click here to log in and be part of the remix — post, add pages , edit the site, play and give technopolitics the reboot.